Friday, 7 February 2014
One of the members of the audience at the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce seminar on combating IP crime on the 12 Dec 2013 was Dr. Elvira Domínguez-Redondo of Middlesex University. Dr. Dominquez-Redondo invited me to give a talk on IP to some of her LLM and LLB students on 3 Feb 2014 an you will find a report of my talk and subsequent discussions with the Dean of the Law School in "Working With Middlesex" 7 Feb 2014 London IP.
In addition to its main campus in London Middlesex University has campuses in Dubai, Malta and Mauritius. The Dubai campus is located in the Dubai Knowledge Village which is "the world’s only free zone area dedicated to human resource management and learning excellence." The campus offers a variety of courses for undergraduates and graduate students and a variety of services for local businesses through the Centre for Innovation in Management.
Although those courses do not yet include law there may still be ways in which we can help. Anything that we may accomplish in Hendon could be replicated at the other Middlesex University campuses. The Dubai International Financial Centre has its own English speaking common law legal system and the recent extension of the jurisdiction of the DIFC courts should facilitate licensing and other knowledge and technology transfer transactions (see "DIFC Courts Spread Their Wings" 7 Dec 2011 and "DIFC Courts: Choice of Jurisdiction Clauses" 28 Dec 2012).
Should anybody wish to discuss this article, my slides or any other topic he or she can contact me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during normal business hours or send me a message through my contact form. He or she can also send me a tweet, write on my wall or contact me through G+, Linkedin or Xing.
Friday, 13 December 2013
Arab-British Chamber of Commerce International Intellectual Property Conference "Combating Transnational Intellectual Property Crime"
Yesterday I was one of the speakers at the Intellectual Property Conference on "Combating Transnational Intellectual Property Crime" which was held at The Langham Hotel in London. The conference was chaired by The Rt. Hon. Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean who had been Minister for the Middle East, Minister for International Trade and Minister for Defence Procurement, and the Prime Minister’s envoy to the Gulf in the last Labour Government in the United Kingdom. She is now Chair of the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce.
Lady Symons introduced Dr Muhammed bin Abdul-Kareem Al-Issa and Dr Bassam Al-Talhouni, the Ministers of Justice of Saudi Arabia and Jordan, and Lord McNally, Minister of State for Justice in England and Wales. All three ministers fulminated against counterfeiting and piracy (though none of them actually defined those terms) and outlined some of the measures that they had taken in their respective jurisdictions to suppress those activities. The Minister from Jordan was the most specific and he was able to report a fall in reported instances which Lady Symons noted. Lord McNally spoke about cyber security. Each of those ministers was presented with a "certificate of appreciation" after their presentations. Lord McNally remarked that he felt like the Tin Man in the Wizard of Oz as he and Lady Symons solemnly displayed the certificate for the cameras.
The next session "Strategic Dialogue on Changing Public Perceptions on Counterfeiting and Intellectual Property Theft" was chaired by Miss. Cherie Booth QC of Matrix Chambers and Omnia Strategy LLP who is perhaps better known as Mrs. Tony Blair. Miss Booth hinted at the temptations in a typical household to download pirated music and buy fake handbags. She spoke of the cost of intellectual property infringement globally and the need to change public behaviour in the way that speed cameras had forced motorists to drive more slowly.
Miss Booth introduced two speakers from Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Nasser Bin Ibrahium Al Mohammed, Head of Judicial Inspection and Member of the Supreme Judicial Council, and Sheikh Ibrahim Bin Abdel Aziz Al Ghossn, President of the National Committee of Lawyers. Sheikh Al Mohammed gave the most moderate presentation up to that point observing that developing countries can be expected to do only so much in enforcing intellectual property rights and that more should be done by developed countries. He also castigated greedy rights holders as well as greedy infringers. Interestingly he seemed to suggest that an owner of any kind of property who failed to take care of it had only himself to blame and that the need to eat was a partial defence or at least a strong mitigating factor in Saudi law. Even though he is president of a body which presumably includes defendants as well as claimants' lawyers, Sheikh Al Ghossn was implacable in his condemnation of pirates and counterfeiters. He argued that IP infringement was not just a wrong or even a crime but a sin in Islam.
Perhaps the most interesting speaker of the whole conference was Mr Adil El Maliki who is Director General of OMPIC (Office Marocain de la Propriété Industrielle et Commerciale) the Moroccan intellectual property office. He outlined the comprehensive intellectual property legislation that Morocco had enacted and the treaties to which it had acceded. He quoted statistics to show that Moroccans were applying for more patents and trade marks which he attributed to those measures.
The last speaker of this session was Mr Robert Bond of Speechly Birham who had been very kind to us when I set up NIPC in 1997 and he was at Hobson Audley. He urged co-operation between rights owners, individuals and businesses in safeguarding intellectual property rights. Public awareness of the importance of intellectual property had to be raised - even in law firms. In that regard he told an alarming story about how an internee was about to post details of a confidential meeting onto Facebook before someone twigged what she was up to and intervened.
There was time for three questions. A barrister who was clearly interested in theology asked Sheikh Al Ghossn exactly what sort of sin was constituted by infringement. Being a Quaker and not a Muslim I must confess that I did not quite understand either the question or answer. I pointed out that IP rights confer monopolies which are not necessarily a good thing. "And your question?" interjected Miss. Booth. "My question is how does Saudi and Moroccan law deal with abuses of such monopolies which can arise either because the rights should never have been granted in the first place or they are used to suppress legitimate competition?" It was clear from the very brief reply that I had not put my question with sufficient clarity.
The last session was "Coordinating Law Enforcement, Government and Business Institutions Actions against Counterfeiters." Viscount Younger of Leckie, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Intellectual Property, summarized comprehensively the measures that had been taken by trading standards officers, the police and the IPO to suppress IP crime. He also announced that he would call a conference on IP enforcement in London shortly, Before the session I had a brief chat with Lord Younger about St Andrews, where we were both students, and my objection and that of the Intellectual Property Bar Association, Sir Robin Jacob and other leading academics, the IP Federation and just about everybody to criminalizing registered design infringement which I set out in more detail in my article on the Intellectual Property Bill in my NIPC law blog of the 28 May 2013.
There was a short and in parts amusing presentation from Mr Majed bin Mohammed bin Garoub who is Secretary General of the Union of Lawyers in the GCC Countries about enforcement in those countries. He explained that he acts for a lot of claimants and he is so diligent in pursuing infringers that he has a name for it.
Our chair, Mr Mike Pullen of DLA Piper, developed Lord McNally's observations on cyber security and data protection. Although an expert on competition law with experience of some leading cases he said very little on the subject which was a pity because he would have had a lot to say on the abuse of dominant positions, contracts in restraint of trade and concerted practices.
David Meldrum, a partner of D Young & Co, spoke of the research and development work that was taking place in such places as the free zones of Dubai like Internet City and the Qatar Science and Technology Park. Inventors and creatives in those places would require a lot of advice on protecting their intellectual assets which is why his firm had opened an office in Dubai.
Eventually it was my turn and to my great horror no slides appeared. Inwardly panicking I said the first thing that came into my head which was a weak joke that nobody was likely to counterfeit my CHF71 Swatch watch. I think I made that quip because someone had speculated that there were probably a lot of fake Rolexes in the room. For the next 10 minutes I ad libbed and I hope that I said something sensible in that time. The presentation that I had intended to give is above.
I was more comfortable dealing with questions. Through my experience of running inventors' clubs and IP clinics and having participated briefly in one of the sessions on the implementation of Sir Richard Lambert's review on business and university co-operation I was able to field a question on ownership of graduate students and academics' inventions. Pertinently Mr Mohammed bin Garoub pointed out that not all academic work leads to patentable inventions. I also answered a question on remedies against states pointing out that in addition to the dispute settlement procedures under the WTO agreement nationals of countries that were party to bilateral investment treaties might have the option of claiming compensation at the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (see "Bilateral Investment Treaties: Claiming Compensation from Foreign Governments under Bilateral Investment Treaties for failing to provide adequate IP Protection" 27 July 2013 NIPC Law and "The UAE's Bilateral Investment Treaties" 28 July 2013).
We then broke for lunch during which time I met some remarkable people including Irina Bragin who supplies lovely handbags made out of carpets and one of the first ladies to be called to the Saudi Arabia bar. Having written recently about the topic in "Saudi Women can now practise Law" 14 Oct 2013 I was delighted to meet her. I told her how good it was to see her country's athletes at the London Olympics and how womankind around the world (and no doubt most men) will rejoice when our Saudi sisters are allowed to drive.
It was a very good meeting and I thank the Arab-British Chamber of Commerce for the invitation to speak. Should anybody wish to discuss this article, my slides or any other topic he or she can contact me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during normal business hours or send me a message through my contact form. He or she can also send me a tweet, write on my wall or contact me through G+, Linkedin or Xing.
Sunday, 1 December 2013
The Arab-British Chamber of Commerce will hold a conference at the Langham Hotel in 1 Portland Place, London W1B 1JA on international intellectual property rights between 09:30 and 15:00 on 12 Dec 2913.
The keynote speaker will be Dr Muhammad bin Abdul-Kareem Al-Issa, the Minister of Justice of Saudi Arabia. I shall be one of the other speakers and will give a very short talk on TRIPS.
Discussions will focus on
- Strategic Dialogue on Changing Public Perceptions on Counterfeiting and Intellectual Property Theft, and
- Coordinating Law Enforcement, Government and Business Institutions Actions against Counterfeiters.
If you want to attend this event you can register through thins link. I look forward to meeting some of my readers there,
Monday, 14 October 2013
As Jonathan Ames points out in his article this development will make it much easier for Western firms to set up joint ventures with local law firms. One firm that already has an alliance with a Saudi law firm is Simmons & Simmons. Their local ally is Hammad & Al-Mehdar of Jeddah which already employs Ms. Arwa Al-Hujaili as a trainee lawyer.
Saturday, 28 September 2013
MIDEM (Marché International du Disque et de l'Edition Musicale) is holding the first music industry trade show for the Middle East and North Africa in Dubai between the 24 and 29 Sept 2013, The event includes conferences, concerts and an exhibition. According to the event website, it is taking place in Dubai because of the diversity of its population and its importance as a business hub and centre of tourism.
The event has been reported by the BBC which asks in its clip "US music stars attend Dubai music industry conference" 28 Sept 2013 whether new Arabic language bands can really make money with "file-sharing and piracy prevalent in the region." Apparently the answer is yes and artists and their managers are developing business models that take advantage of those technologies.
A lesson for the rest of the world perhaps.
Sunday, 15 September 2013
In my Overview of Saudi IP law of 22 May 2011 I noted that Saudi Arabia does not have an intellectual property as such and that responsibility for protecting brands, technology and works of art and literature is shared by the Ministry of Commerce and Indutry, The King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology and the Ministry of Culture respectively.
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is in Riyadh. There is a Trade Marks section which can be contacted at +(966 1) 206 9449. The Ministry has now translated into English some of the relevant legislation. WIPO has published statistics for patent, designs and trade mark grants and applications up to 2011.
Monday, 19 August 2013
Ambush marketing has been defined as "a marketing strategy that consists in a company hitching a ride on the back of the sponsor of a sports event whose programme of sponsorship is particularly ill conceived and/or poorly executed" (see Jean-Michel Marmayou "Major Sports Events: How to Prevent Ambush Marketing" African Sports Law and Business Bulletin, 1/2013). A good example of ambush marketing was the distribution of clothing by a Dutch brewery in the 2006 and 2010 World Cups ostensibly in the colours of the Dutch national team that just happened to be the same as those of the brewery (see Jon Kelly "How ambush marketing ambushed sport" 17 June 2009 BBC News Magazine). The brewery which had not sponsored the event got free TV advertising in the Netherlands much to the consternation of another brewery that had sponsored the event.
The mischief of ambush marketing, so it is said, is that it discourages sponsorship and thus increases the expense and risk of hosting the event. At least that is the justification for the draconian legislation proposed by the Scottish government in its Consultation on Draft Glasgow Commonwealth Games (Trading and Advertising) (Scotland) Regulations 2013
"Games sponsors provide a vital source of funding for the Commonwealth Games, without which Scotland would not be able to host the Games."My answer to that is that if it is true then maybe we should re-think the way sporting competitions are organized and consider less expensive ways of staging them (see my article "Olympics Association Right and London Olympics Association Right" 31 July 2012 NIPClaw in respect of the notorious London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006 and the far more strident criticism of Brian Perlanda in
"The Anti-Competitive Olympic Games" 1 July 2012 54 Orange County Lawyer, No 7, 32).
Nevertheless, we are where we are and the host city contract by which the Qatari Local Organizing Committee and each municipality hosting a match will contain clauses that would inhibit ambush marketing. That may well require special legislation in Qatar along the lines of the legislation for the London Olympics and Glasgow Commonwealth Games. In his article "Qatar! 2022!" in Al-Tamini's Law Update for March 2011 Stephen Jiew wrote:
"It remains to be seen whether Qatar will be enacting legislation specific to the FIFA World Cup to combat ambush marketing as did South Africa as hosts in 2010. If past enforcement efforts are anything to go by, the following could be key features of the event organiser’s program in the combat ahead with ambush marketers:The problem of ambush marketing and the response of host governments will be one of the many topics that we shall discuss at a conference on IP and sports that we plan to hold in London early in the new year. Though the immediate emphasis will be on Brazil as it is holding the World Cup next year and the Olympics in 2016 there will be lots to interest Qataris and others from the Gulf and indeed wider Middle East North Africa Area. If anyone wants to be involved in this project give me a ring on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 or contact me through Facebook, Linkedin, twitter or Xing, or fill in my contact page.
- Charge a special purpose vehicle with the authority to investigate and sue ambush marketers and infringers.
- Embark on an education campaign on the basics of intellectual property and ambush marketing including advertisements in consumer and trade publications targeting the public, retailers, potential sponsors, suppliers, licensees and athlete agents.
- Publicise legal actions filed alleging IP infringements.
- Conduct market surveillance of unlicensed merchandise and infringements.
- Put in place strict regulations at the official venues regulating the rules of entry such that non sponsor merchandise is banned.- See more at: http://www.tamimi.com/en/magazine/law-update/section-7/march-6/qatar-2022.html#sthash.6hBavwwc.dpuf"