Why is there no longer a British IP Attaché to the Gulf Co-operation Council?

Author IJA Public Domain Source Wikimedia Commons

British EmbassyAbu Dhabi

 

Jane Lambert

The UK Intellectual Property Office has published a Linkedin newsletter called IPO Overseas,  It is about the UK's network of overseas IP attachés, trade experts and UK-based policy teams.  The latest issue, which was published on 26 July 2024, is entitled "IPO's Middle East and North Africa ('MENA') International Team.,  Although the subtitle is "How our IP Attaché network can help you do business with the Middle East and North Africa" the publication features an interview with  Ben Llewellyn-Jones, IPO’s Director of Business and International Policy and not with an attaché.

The British government used to have an attaché to the Gulf Cooperation Council ("GCC"), On 27 Oct 2021 I wrote that HM government signalled the importance of the GCC as a trading and investment partner by appointing Yamish Yakoob as its first Intellectual Property Attaché to the bloc in UK's New Intellectual Property Attache to the GCC.  I based my article on the IPO's Case Study IP Attaché: Yamish Yakoob, Gulf Cooperation Council of 7 Oct 2021 which was apparently withdrawn on 27 March 2024.  No explanation has been given for the withdrawal.  Mr Yakoob is still at the British embassy in Riyadh but his new job title is "Retail, Food & Drink @ British Embassy." His LinkedIn page indicates that he started that job in April 2024.

In his interview, Mr Llewellyn-Jones said that the GCC is this country's 4th largest non-EU trading partner after the USA, China and Switzerland and that British trade with that region is worth around £59 billion.  He indicated that the government is negotiating a free trade agreement with the GCC.  He mentioned that UK businesses can face a number of challenges when registering and protecting their IP in the Middle East. These can range from the need to take effective action against trade mark infringement to high registration fees.

Mr Llewellyn Jones encouraged British businesses to use the IPO's international team: The team knows that local IP systems can be difficult for some to navigate even if a business has registered its IP in the UK with the IPO. He said:

“This is where our international team can help with their local knowledge”, said Ben. “We can help to guide businesses through these IP systems, guide you through what to expect and support you as you build your business overseas”

His top tips were:

• "If you're looking to trade in MENA and the GCC, include IP as part of your market research or export plan
• Do your due diligence and check, for example, if someone already registered a trade mark that is the same as yours. If you're not sure, we'll have a complex portfolio of IP rights and legal experts who will be able to help you.
• Finally, if your IP is an important part of your business value, register your rights as soon as you can!"

The British government has published further guidance and information on doing business and the IP issues that arise in the Middle East which is not linked directly to the IPO's newsletter.   However, I incorporated that guidance and information and combined it with my own in IPO Guidance on the Gulf Cooperation Council on 8 April 2023.

One resource that the IPO does not mention and perhaps should is that there are English-speaking common law courts in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Qatar.  Each of those courts has judges who practised in the UK or other Commonwealth common law jurisdictions and all members of the Bar of England and Wales can qualify easily to appear before them.  If a British company is thinking of licensing its technology, distributing its goods or franchising its services in the region it may find advantages in choosing the law of one of those legal systems as the proper law and its courts as the forum for future dispute resolution. 

This is an area in which my chambers have some expertise.  Colleagues who practise other areas of law already appear before those courts.  Last year, Stephen Somerville, our first deputy senior clerk visited Dubai and he has been sufficiently encouraged by that visit to make a second trip later this year.   Anyone interested in using our expertise and connections should contact me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during UK office hours or send me a message at other times through my contact page.

IP Law in Palestine

 

Jane Lambert

Gaza and the West Bank of the River Jordan may not be in the Gulf but they are part of the Middle East North Africa region and those districts have plenty of links with the Gulf Cooperation Council states. Right now intellectual property is probably the last thing on the minds of the inhabitants of those areas but it is to be hoped that a time will come when the guns fall silent and their shattered economies can be reconstructed. Such reconstruction will require massive investment much of which could come from the GCC countries.  However, such investors will wish to see that their investments in branding, design, technology and creativity are protected adequately.

Finding information about the legal protection that is available in those territories is not easy because they are among the few parts of the world that are not yet party to the WIPO Convention.  That does not, however, mean that they have no interest in intellectual property.  When I visited the WIPO between 2 and 4 Sept 2019 to address the Advisory Committee on Enforcement I had the honour of sharing a table with the Palestinian observer to the proceedings (see Another Side of the WIPO 5 Sept 2019 NIPC News).  While chatting in the intermissions I learned that he was legally qualified and that he had actually been instructed in IP cases before entering public service.

As he did not seem to know any of the delegates whom I had been addressing I offered to introduce him.  We started with the British delegation which was staffed by Elizabeth Jones of the Intellectual Property Office and District Judge Hart of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track and had just moved on to the American delegation when the chairperson called the meeting to order and we had to return to our seats.

The only information that I have been able to find out about Palestinian IP law from the WIPO Lex web page is that it is party to 29 treaties none of which seems to relate to IP and that the link to its national intellectual property office leads to An-Najah National University.  Another page on the WIPO website states:

"The term patent protection is four years as from the filing date, renewable for additional three periods of four years each. Palestine is not part of the TRIPS Agreement; therefore it is not obliged to have a minimum 20 year protection term."

I have, however, found a thesis by Ihab G. Samaan entitled A Historical View of Intellectual Property Rights in the Palestinian Territories which states on page 63 that:

"there are a number of laws protecting intellectual property rights. These are inherited from the British Mandate and the period of Jordanian rule in the West Bank. The Patents and Designs Ordinance No. 33 of 1924 and the Trademarks Ordinance No. 35 of 1938 are in force in the Gaza Strip, while the Patents for Inventions and Industrial Designs Law No. 22 of 1953 and the Trademarks Law No. 33 of 1953 are in force in the West Bank. The Copyright Act of 1911, as incorporated in Palestine and amended by the Copyright Ordinance No. 16 of 1924, is in force in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip."

This seems to be consistent with information published by law firms with offices in the area.  The reason for the differences between the laws in Gaza and those in the West Bank appears to be that Gaza was administered by Egypt between 1948 and 1967 and the West Bank by Jordan during those years.

If and when I find out more about the laws of those territories I shall publish them here.   In the meantime, anybody who wants to discuss the topic can call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during UK business hours or send me a message through my contact page,  

Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in the DIFC

 

Jane Lambert

On 14 Nov 2019, the Ruler of Dubai proclaimed the DIFC Intellectual Property Law (DIFC Law No. 4 of 2019) ("the IPL"). That legislation does not create a separate body of intellectual property rights for the Dubai International Financial Centre ("DIFC"). It provides for the enforcement of rights subsisting under Emirati federal law in the financial centre.  I have discussed the IPL in the following articles:

• Introduction to, and Overview of, the New DIFC Intellectual Property Law on 11 Dec 2019; 
• The New DIFC Intellectual Property Law - Patents and Utility Certificates on 9 Jan 2020;
• The New DIFC Intellectual Property Law - Designs on 7 June 2020; 
• The New DIFC Intellectual Property Law - Copyright and Neighbouring Rights on 28 June 2020;
• The New DIFC Intellectual Property Law - Trade Marks and Trade Names on 20 Sept 2020; and
• DIFC Trade Secrecy Law on 7 July 2021.

One of the most interesting provisions of the IPL is the establishment of a Commissioner of Intellectual Property ("the commissioner").  Art 5 of the enactment provides that the IPL and any legislation made for the purpose of that law shall be administered by that commissioner.  He or she has very extensive powers under art 59 of the IPL.

In accordance with art 56 (1) of the IPL, the President of the DIFC has appointed Dr Tarek Hajjiri as the DIFC's first commissioner.   He has been interviewed on Al-Tamimi & Co's YouTube channel (see Mariam Sabet interviews Dr Tarek Hajjiri, Senior Vice President - #INTA202). One of his most important functions is

"receiving and deciding on all complaints or disputes filed in connection with the Law in the DIFC, and imposing fines for non-compliance with this Law and any related Regulations"

under art 59 (3) (a) of the IPL.  Pursuant to art 60 (1) of the law, the DIFC's directors have made the Intellectual Property Regulations ("IPR") to assist him in exercising that function.

Complaints filed with the commissioner must contain the following information:

"(a) full name, address and capacity of the Complainant;
(b) the name and details of the Respondent;
(c) the details of the complaint;
(d) a detailed statement of the alleged facts which the Complainant believes gives rise to the complaint; and
(e) the relief sought by the Complainant."

The complaint should be  supported by the following documents:

"(a) proof of ownership of intellectual property rights or the right to claim protection pursuant to such ownership, which may include patent registration certificates, trademark registration certificates and agreements evidencing ownership; 

(b) if a complaint is filed on behalf of the owner of the intellectual property or the holder of intellectual property rights, a suitable power of attorney; 

(c) any documents or other evidences, including witness statements, confirming that the infringement, misappropriation or conflict occurred within the DIFC; 

(d) proof of payment of the fees in accordance with Regulation 2.3; and 

(e) an undertaking to cover any costs and expenses incurred by the Commissioner (or his delegate) to investigate the complaint."

Unless the commissioner is of opinion that notifying a respondent of a complaint may pose a risk to the investigation of the complaint or the preservation of evidence relating to the complaint, he must notify the respondent in writing of the details of a complaint filed against him or her, within 10 business days of receiving the complaint or any additional documents, information or other evidence that the commissioner may have requested, whichever may be later.

A respondent has the right to respond to a complaint within 10 business days of receiving it or such other time as the commissioner may allow.  The commissioner should provide the complainant with a copy of the response together with any supporting documents on which the respondent may rely.  The complainant may then file a reply to any further points raised by the Respondent in his or her response. Any such reply must be filed by the complainant within 10 business days of receiving the respondent’s response from the commissioner or such other time as the commissioner may allow. The commissioner must provide the respondent with a copy of any reply that may be submitted by the complainant.

The commissioner may invite one or more of the parties to a meeting to discuss the dispute if he is minded to issue a direction.  He may also visit the respondent's premises with (or in some cases without) notice to inspect or collect evidence.  The parties may be represented in any of these proceedings by a legal practitioner registered on Part I or Part II of the DIFC Courts' Register of Legal Practitioners. My chambers are listed in Part II of that register and my friend Arann Dowling-Hussey who is also a member of the Irish Bar practises in the DIFC courts.  Other members of the English Bar including intellectual property specialists can qualify easily to practise in the DIFC.

After considering a complaint and completing all the investigations and inspections that the commissioner may deem necessary, he must issue a direction in accordance with art 66 of the IPL and art 3.1 of the IPR. If the commissioner is satisfied that a person has violated the IPL, he may issue a direction with 1 or more of the following measures: 

(i) order the respondent to refrain from the violation and carry out all necessary acts to comply with the IPL; 

(ii) request the DIFC Registrar of Companies to suspend temporarily the respondent's DIFC licence; 

(iii) order confiscation of all materials, goods, tools, machines, equipment, signs and advertisements related to the violation and order the transfer, storage and destruction of the same, at the expense of the respondent; 

(iv) impose fines in accordance with art 66 (1) and Sched 3 of the IPL; or 

(v) in case of a repeated infringement, request the DIFC Registrar of Companies to revoke the DIFC licence of the respondent.   The commissioner may also impose up to double the fines stipulated in Sched 3 pursuant to art 66 (2) of the IPL

If the commissioner is not satisfied that a person has violated the Law, he may issue a direction rejecting the complaint.   Alternatively, if the commissioner is unable to decide whether a violation has been committed, he will issue a direction requesting the parties to refer the matter to the DIFC Court of First Instance ("the court").

Should a respondent fail to comply with a direction the commissioner may apply to the court for an order to compel him or her to do so under art 66 (5) of the IPL  Any person aggrieved by the direction of the commissioner may file a request to the court to review the direction within 15 days of receiving a notice of direction from the commissioner.

My Deputy Senior Clerk, Stephen Somerville, has recently returned from a short visit to Dubai where he met several of my readers including some who practise before the DIFC Courts. He was accompanied by Arran and other members of chambers who were there for Dubai Arbitration Week 2023.  Those members have penned Decree No 34 of 2021 Concerning the Dubai International Arbitration Centre: Two Years On: Some Practical Issues which discusses recent changes to arbitration law in that emirate.

Anyone wishing to discuss my article or any of the topics mentioned in it may call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during UK office hours or send me a message through my contact form.

WIPO Design Law Treaty Diplomatic Conference to Take Place in Saudi Arabia

 

Author Emmanuel Berrod Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed Source Wikimedia Commons

Jane Lambert

A diplomatic conference is a meeting of representatives of governments that are negotiating the terms of an international agreement. On 21 July 2022, the WIPO General Assembly voted to convene a diplomatic conference to conclude and adopt a Design Law Treaty before the end of 2024.  On 9 Oct 2023, the Preparatory Committee of the Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty agreed to hold the conference in Riyadh between 11 and 22 Nov 2023 (see Saudi Arabia Set to Host 2024 Diplomatic Conference to Conclude Design Law Treaty PR/2023/909 9 Oct 2023).

Although countries that belong to the World Trade Organization are bound by arts 25 and 26 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights ("TRIPS") to protect new or original industrial designs for at least 10 years and the Hague Agreement facilitates international design registration, the requirements for registration vary considerably from country to country.   The Design Law Treaty is intended to iron out those differences.   A draft of the proposed Treaty and its Regulations have been circulating for some time.  According to the WIPO press release,, the Treaty should make it significantly easier for designers and small and medium-sized enterprises to register their designs.

The new Treaty coincides with the Commission's proposals for a new Designs Directive to replace Directive 98/71/EC and amendments to the Community Design Regulation which I shall discuss in detail in NIPC News and IP after Brexit.,

Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during UK office hours or send me a message through my contact page.

IPO Guidance on the Gulf Cooperation Council

 

Jane Lambert

On 6 April 2023 the UK Intellectual Property Office ("the IPO") circulated an email headed "Are you a UK business trading in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)? Or thinking of doing so?" to its mailing list, The email announced that the IPO had published guidance to help businesses navigate the IP regimes in each of the six GCC member states providing information on the main IP rights and where to go for further guidance,  It added that the GCC was the UK's 7th largest export market worth £33.1 billion in 2021, that the UK has a longstanding relationship with the GCC, particularly in areas like technology, life sciences, creative industries, financial services and education, and that intellectual property will play a vital role in securing British ambitions in the region.

International IP Service

A button on the email connects to a web page on the British government's website headed Collection International IP Service with the strapline "Protecting your trade marks, patents, designs and copyright abroad" which was first published on 20 Aug 2021 and last updated on 10 March 2023.  It begins with a general observation:

"Intellectual property rights are territorial. You should consider getting IP protection if you want to trade overseas or sell to overseas customers via the internet. Start by developing an international strategy, identifying your markets, business goals and resources."

 I would endorse that advice adding only that an international strategy is an aspect of an IP strategy which is something that every business should develop whether an individual on his or her first day in business or a mighty multinational  (see What is an Intellectual Property Strategy? 19 May 2017 last updated 8 April 2023).  I could help with that as I have many years experience of advising on IP strategy and have written many articles on the topic.

Top Tip

I would also endorse the IPO's "Top Tip":

"Know before you go. Wherever you want to do business, it is important that you understand the steps you should take to protect your IP before entering the market. It is a lot easier to jump over any hurdles before realising it might be too late to act. You will also need to do some research to make sure you’re not infringing someone else’s IP."

Meet the Experts: Yamesh Yaqoob

The next link introduces our IP attachés which are listed on a separate Attaché contact details page.  Our main in the GCC countries is Mr Yamish Yaqoob whose appointment I reported in UK's New Intellectual Property Attache to the GCC on 27 Oct 2021.  The section on Mr Yaqoob states:

"Focus on the GCC: Yamish provides guidance to UK stakeholders in the GCC region on how to effectively protect and manage their IP assets. He also works closely with regional IPOs and official authorities on outreach and awareness raising of the value of IP. Yamish will input on IP in a Free Trade Agreement with the GCC, to further build bilateral cooperation within the GCC on IP practice and policy. Currently, he is also working in close collaboration with the Saudi IP authority on delivering a joint work plan aimed at improving the local IP ecosystem."

IP Country Guides

The International IP Service page links to a list of IP Country Guides.  These include guides on:

• Bahrain 
• Kuwait 
• Oman 
• Qatar
• Saudi Arabia and 
• the United Arab Emirates ("UAE"). 

Each of those guides was published on 2 March 2023 and follows a similar format.  There are passages on trade marks, patents, designs, copyright, enforcement and sources of further information.

The guidance on the UAE fails to mention the English speaking common law jurisdictions in the Abu Dhabi Global Market and the Dubai International Financial Centre free zones.  I have discussed the DIFC courts extensively in this publication and I introduced the Abu Dhabi Global Market legal system in Abu Dhabi Global Market - Yet Another Common Law Enclave in the Gulf on 22 Feb 2016.  It is worth remembering that the DIFC has its own intellectual property legislation which I mentioned in Introduction to, and Overview of, the New DIFC Intellectual Property Law on 13 Dec 2019.  The DIFC courts have always had jurisdiction to hear and determine breach of confidence and passing off and there seems to be no reason in principle why they should not grant injunctions, delivery up of infringing matter and pecuniary relief for infringements of the DIFC Intellectual Property Law.  Having said that, the Law establishes an Intellectual Property Commissioner with extensive powers to resolve IP disputes.

There is a similar English speaking common law jurisdiction at the Qatar Financial Centre known as the  Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre which I discussed in Qatar Financial Centre: Civil and Commercial Court Regulations on 28 June 2011 and subsequent articles.  The IPO guidance on Qatar does not mention that court or legal system.

Any member of the Bar of England and Wales in good standing can quickly be granted rights of audience in any of those courts.  The procedural law and practice of all three courts are modelled on the English Civil Procedure Rules.  Much of the substantive law is also modelled on British statutes or codifications of English case law. Some of the litigation is conducted online which means that members of the English bar can represent parties from their chambers in London or even their homes elsewhere in the UK. 

Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 or send me a message through my contact page.

The Oman Commercial Arbitration Centre

Mr James Bridgeman SC

 

Jane Lambert

I am delighted to report that my friend and colleague, James Bridgeman SC, will give a talk entitled  "Commencing an International Arbitration under the laws of England & Wales" n the Muscat Hall of the Oman Commercial Arbitration Centre ("OCAC") between 10:30 and 13:30 tomorrow.  James is a member of my chambers and a silk of the Republic of Ireland Bar.   He is also a member of the Bars of England and Wales and Northern Ireland, a past President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and an accredited mediator.  He sits on several dispute resolution panels including the arbitration and domain name dispute resolution panels of the World Intellectual Property Organization. 

Oman is the latest member state of the Gulf Cooperation Council to establish an international dispute resolution centre.  The United Arab Emirates has the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts and the Abu Dhabi Global Markets Courts, Qatar has the Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre and Bahrain has the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution.   The OCAC was founded by Royal Decree 26/2018  dated 17 Oct 2018.   The Centre is governed by Regulations issued by the Board of Directors Chairman of the Oman Chamber of Commerce pursuant to art 2 of the Royal Decree. 

The Centre was set up to encourage investment in accordance with Oman's 2040 Vision.  It offers arbitration, mediation and other alternative dispute resolution through its panellists.  Its arbitration and mediation rules are published on its website.  OCAC also trains arbitrators in collaboration with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and mediators in collaboration with the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution ("CEDR").  Photos of its hearing and meeting rooms, hire charges and other costs appear on the OCAC's website.

Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me during UK office hours or send me a message through my contact form. 

The DIFC Courts' Space Dispute Guide

Standard YouTube Licence

Jane Lambert

On 18 Nov 2017, I introduced Dubai's Courts of the Future Initiative.  That initiative has two projects:

• Courts of the Blockchain; and
• Courts of Space.

I discussed the DIFC Space Courts on 10 Feb 2021.  An international expert working group will explore space-related legal innovations and consider potential space-related disputes and the likely outcomes in a Space Dispute Guide.  The foreword to that guide explains that it was prepared to demonstrate the type of disputes that the DIFC Courts expect to decide. They include disputes between states, space agencies, businesses and individuals over the manufacture, launch, navigation, and re-entry of a space object arising out of contract, tort, legislation or treaty.  The guide discusses two possible disputes,  One is between a company and a state over damage to a satellite caused by space debris. The other is about the liability of parties to a launch contract after the insolvency of a bank that agreed to guarantee the transaction.

Anybody wishing to discuss this article may call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during normal UK office hours or message me through my contact page at other times.